<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: American Cultural Malaise</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thinkingloud.org/2007/05/24/american-cultural-malaise/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thinkingloud.org/2007/05/24/american-cultural-malaise/</link>
	<description>Thought is the seed of every action, be it good or bad...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 01:25:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jerry</title>
		<link>http://www.thinkingloud.org/2007/05/24/american-cultural-malaise/comment-page-1/#comment-335</link>
		<dc:creator>Jerry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 03:56:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkingloud.org/2007/05/24/american-cultural-malaise/#comment-335</guid>
		<description>Rodrigo,

I concur that we agree on some point, but the point at which you seem to pick a disagreement surprises me, seeing that we even agree on that point. The problem with man is not God or religion, but the abuse and misrepresentation of religion and the use of God&#039;s name in lording it over others. Please, let me stress that a philosophy is not bad because of it&#039;s missed used, any philosophy, any world view even that of Nature admirer or worshiper could be abused and miss used for human selfish purposes, and this could quickly become tyrannical.

Yes I do, admire and enjoy nature, but in doing this, I&#039;m logically compel to seek and  know more about the one that put together all these beauty in nature that I so much enjoy. It&#039;s like saying, I like and admire a painting, wouldn&#039;t it make logical sense to go further and try to know who the artist is that painted the painting? The fact that we can&#039;t see God with our physical eyes doesn&#039;t mean God doesn&#039;t exist. There are millions of things we can&#039;t see but still believe they exist, like the wind, atoms, quarks, electrons, blackhole, other dimension of existence lower and higher than ours... A being that exist in one dimensional universe can&#039;t perceive a being from a three dimensional universe.  So trying to define and limit God with our very limited senses and perception of the universe is detrimental and presumptuousness at most. 

Now talking about Henry Thoreau, Mark Twain, Carl Sagan, Edward Wilson, their philosophical disposition I&#039;m well aquatinted with, humanistic, atheistic and naturalistic, all these I&#039;ve taken the time to familiarized myself with and even beyond, and I&#039;m very comfortable in discussing the flaws inherent within these world views. In return I would suggest you try this author &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.veritas.org/media/presenters/164&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Ravi Zacharias&lt;/a&gt;&quot;, J.P. Moreland, Michael J. Behe. Till we human understand, fully grasp and imbibe the concept of true love we are bound to keep making the same mistake over and over again. 
Thank you...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rodrigo,</p>
<p>I concur that we agree on some point, but the point at which you seem to pick a disagreement surprises me, seeing that we even agree on that point. The problem with man is not God or religion, but the abuse and misrepresentation of religion and the use of God&#8217;s name in lording it over others. Please, let me stress that a philosophy is not bad because of it&#8217;s missed used, any philosophy, any world view even that of Nature admirer or worshiper could be abused and miss used for human selfish purposes, and this could quickly become tyrannical.</p>
<p>Yes I do, admire and enjoy nature, but in doing this, I&#8217;m logically compel to seek and  know more about the one that put together all these beauty in nature that I so much enjoy. It&#8217;s like saying, I like and admire a painting, wouldn&#8217;t it make logical sense to go further and try to know who the artist is that painted the painting? The fact that we can&#8217;t see God with our physical eyes doesn&#8217;t mean God doesn&#8217;t exist. There are millions of things we can&#8217;t see but still believe they exist, like the wind, atoms, quarks, electrons, blackhole, other dimension of existence lower and higher than ours&#8230; A being that exist in one dimensional universe can&#8217;t perceive a being from a three dimensional universe.  So trying to define and limit God with our very limited senses and perception of the universe is detrimental and presumptuousness at most. </p>
<p>Now talking about Henry Thoreau, Mark Twain, Carl Sagan, Edward Wilson, their philosophical disposition I&#8217;m well aquatinted with, humanistic, atheistic and naturalistic, all these I&#8217;ve taken the time to familiarized myself with and even beyond, and I&#8217;m very comfortable in discussing the flaws inherent within these world views. In return I would suggest you try this author &#8220;<a href="http://www.veritas.org/media/presenters/164" rel="nofollow">Ravi Zacharias</a>&#8220;, J.P. Moreland, Michael J. Behe. Till we human understand, fully grasp and imbibe the concept of true love we are bound to keep making the same mistake over and over again.<br />
Thank you&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rodrigo Dias</title>
		<link>http://www.thinkingloud.org/2007/05/24/american-cultural-malaise/comment-page-1/#comment-334</link>
		<dc:creator>Rodrigo Dias</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 15:10:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkingloud.org/2007/05/24/american-cultural-malaise/#comment-334</guid>
		<description>Jerry, I had to agree with you that our days are lacking understanding, but to imply that God is the solution is to ignore how partial this solution might be. Those who speak in God&#039;s name usually only seek the power it provides, and this way many cultures have been destroyed together with their differing views of mankind and Nature. If you dive into the works of people such as Mark Twain, Henry Thoreau, Carl Sagan and Edward Wilson (the entomologyst), maybe you&#039;ll find that the respect and admiration for Nature (and not for an invisible being) could lead us to a better, more diverse and more sensible society.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jerry, I had to agree with you that our days are lacking understanding, but to imply that God is the solution is to ignore how partial this solution might be. Those who speak in God&#8217;s name usually only seek the power it provides, and this way many cultures have been destroyed together with their differing views of mankind and Nature. If you dive into the works of people such as Mark Twain, Henry Thoreau, Carl Sagan and Edward Wilson (the entomologyst), maybe you&#8217;ll find that the respect and admiration for Nature (and not for an invisible being) could lead us to a better, more diverse and more sensible society.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jerry</title>
		<link>http://www.thinkingloud.org/2007/05/24/american-cultural-malaise/comment-page-1/#comment-65</link>
		<dc:creator>Jerry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jul 2007 13:08:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkingloud.org/2007/05/24/american-cultural-malaise/#comment-65</guid>
		<description>Hi Anya,
Yes I wrote the article... Your feeling that the thought seems somewhat unfinished, might have been caused by the fact that the article is a cursory look at the origins of present day American cultural challenges.

It wasn&#039;t meant to be a complete, comprehensive study of the culture, but rather I meant for it to get people really thinking critically about our present day cultural quagmire. To write a comprehensive and well elaborated article on this subject, means I would have to write a book, and at this moment time doesn&#039;t permits me that opportunity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Anya,<br />
Yes I wrote the article&#8230; Your feeling that the thought seems somewhat unfinished, might have been caused by the fact that the article is a cursory look at the origins of present day American cultural challenges.</p>
<p>It wasn&#8217;t meant to be a complete, comprehensive study of the culture, but rather I meant for it to get people really thinking critically about our present day cultural quagmire. To write a comprehensive and well elaborated article on this subject, means I would have to write a book, and at this moment time doesn&#8217;t permits me that opportunity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anya</title>
		<link>http://www.thinkingloud.org/2007/05/24/american-cultural-malaise/comment-page-1/#comment-64</link>
		<dc:creator>Anya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jul 2007 07:14:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkingloud.org/2007/05/24/american-cultural-malaise/#comment-64</guid>
		<description>Hi, Jerry
I really like this stuff. Did you write it, or is it a quote? The thought feels somewhat unfinished, but it&#039;s cool stuff.
I have an interesting article, also about America&#039;s new reality, here:http://www.urbanministry.org/new-divide-online-segregation-church-0</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, Jerry<br />
I really like this stuff. Did you write it, or is it a quote? The thought feels somewhat unfinished, but it&#8217;s cool stuff.<br />
I have an interesting article, also about America&#8217;s new reality, here:http://www.urbanministry.org/new-divide-online-segregation-church-0</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
